March 18, 2008 (revised): Regarding Churchwell's repugnant "child porno writer" lie, here is exactly what I wrote about him on that long ago satire blog:"I started masturbating at a very young age, before 5th grade, maybe younger."
Churchwell has written reams of lies about that one benign sentence. He never actually quotes the sentence, of course, and never mentions the post in which it appeared three years ago. He just spends his days in blogland screaming: "Child porno!"
This might be a snoozer, but if you are interested to know the context, it came from a post imagining his "back story." In keeping with the tone of my blog, which was satire, I wrote a post describing what he might have been like when he was a kid, teenager and young man, decades before he became a nightmare on the blogs. Futilely, I was exploring the question: How did Thomas Churchwell become the weirdly sex-obsessed, woman hating cyber bully that he is today?
Here is the entire post, as I posted it three years ago:
Fans ask me all the time about my sex life. I started masturbating at a very young age, before 5th grade, maybe younger. I remember being aroused by fictional characters. Like, sometimes I would fantasize about tying up the tooth fairy and socking her in the mouth. Then for about two years I had dreams about a groundhog. Every February, I got excited when he saw his shadow. I outgrew the woodland creature thing and developed a thing for fat girls. Huge breasts, underarm rolls and bloated bellies! One of my favorite dreams had a fat supermodel knocking on my window in the middle of the night. We'd take her limo to McDonald's, spend shit loads of money, and stuff ourselves on cheeseburgers till dawn. My last girlfriend was old. I called her Angel. I lived with her for 3 months and that was two months too long! It's been a while since I moved out, but I can't stop thinking about the couple that lived next door. Every Saturday night, I could hear them spanking each other. I love being spanked, anywhere, any time! I don't know why, but I am fucking obsessed with having people spank me. I found out today that I like to grab my own ass and spank it when I'm in the shower.
That's it. A silly, forgettable post that was meant to satirize Churchwell's own loony writings. Clearly, there was nothing in it that a rational person would call "pornographic".
Quote from a victim resource site:
"Character assasination is one of the bully's most important techniques. He demonizes his victims. Everyone he attacks "deserves" it. His victims are perverts, liars, thieves, whatever tag he thinks he can make stick. (Actually he does this, whether he thinks it will stick or not). Then he pounds his victims again and again. It doesn't matter that the accusations are not true. It is the technique of repetition, time and again, that works in the bully's mind. And once a victim is on the bully's list, he will attack her relentlessly."
That description fits Churchwell to a T, doesn't it?
His ranting about imaginary "child porno" is libelous and sick. Some have described it as a pathological fix. Which seems to be the case, because he has accused at least three other bloggers of the same thing! By making these accusations for years, he has aroused suspicion that he likes child pornography, and could it be that he really does? And that, like a moth to a flame, his obsessive rants reflect an irresistible attraction?
I don't know the answer to that question, but some of you are aware that he visits child porn websites. Here is a link to one site:
Second Life Herald: Virtual Child Porn in Second Life www.secondlifeherald.com/slh/2004/12/virtual_child_p.html
Churchwell posted on the above site as "KMA" (a reader on his old blog), but he registered in his own name and in his own highly recognizable writing style, ironically posted a quasi sex story about himself as a child. In addition, he has concocted dozens of sexually sick blogs about me and other women, written two sick blogs about Susan's minor son, and sent emails to her, and to me, describing fantasy sex acts with this child in horrifying detail. Sounds like more revelations for his psychiatrist, doesn't it?
Update June 1, 2009: Another year has passed, and the liar is still at it. Does anyone else find it disgusting and also telling that Thomas Churchwell continues to profess moral outrage over non-existent "child porno" stories, yet posts snapshots on his blog of nude, underage girls? A recent picture he posted of a 16-year-old with her finger inserted in her body absolutely IS child pornography, as defined by United States law.
Here is the entire post, as I posted it three years ago:
Fans ask me all the time about my sex life. I started masturbating at a very young age, before 5th grade, maybe younger. I remember being aroused by fictional characters. Like, sometimes I would fantasize about tying up the tooth fairy and socking her in the mouth. Then for about two years I had dreams about a groundhog. Every February, I got excited when he saw his shadow. I outgrew the woodland creature thing and developed a thing for fat girls. Huge breasts, underarm rolls and bloated bellies! One of my favorite dreams had a fat supermodel knocking on my window in the middle of the night. We'd take her limo to McDonald's, spend shit loads of money, and stuff ourselves on cheeseburgers till dawn. My last girlfriend was old. I called her Angel. I lived with her for 3 months and that was two months too long! It's been a while since I moved out, but I can't stop thinking about the couple that lived next door. Every Saturday night, I could hear them spanking each other. I love being spanked, anywhere, any time! I don't know why, but I am fucking obsessed with having people spank me. I found out today that I like to grab my own ass and spank it when I'm in the shower.
That's it. A silly, forgettable post that was meant to satirize Churchwell's own loony writings. Clearly, there was nothing in it that a rational person would call "pornographic".
Quote from a victim resource site:
"Character assasination is one of the bully's most important techniques. He demonizes his victims. Everyone he attacks "deserves" it. His victims are perverts, liars, thieves, whatever tag he thinks he can make stick. (Actually he does this, whether he thinks it will stick or not). Then he pounds his victims again and again. It doesn't matter that the accusations are not true. It is the technique of repetition, time and again, that works in the bully's mind. And once a victim is on the bully's list, he will attack her relentlessly."
That description fits Churchwell to a T, doesn't it?
His ranting about imaginary "child porno" is libelous and sick. Some have described it as a pathological fix. Which seems to be the case, because he has accused at least three other bloggers of the same thing! By making these accusations for years, he has aroused suspicion that he likes child pornography, and could it be that he really does? And that, like a moth to a flame, his obsessive rants reflect an irresistible attraction?
I don't know the answer to that question, but some of you are aware that he visits child porn websites. Here is a link to one site:
Second Life Herald: Virtual Child Porn in Second Life www.secondlifeherald.com/slh/2004/12/virtual_child_p.html
Churchwell posted on the above site as "KMA" (a reader on his old blog), but he registered in his own name and in his own highly recognizable writing style, ironically posted a quasi sex story about himself as a child. In addition, he has concocted dozens of sexually sick blogs about me and other women, written two sick blogs about Susan's minor son, and sent emails to her, and to me, describing fantasy sex acts with this child in horrifying detail. Sounds like more revelations for his psychiatrist, doesn't it?
Update June 1, 2009: Another year has passed, and the liar is still at it. Does anyone else find it disgusting and also telling that Thomas Churchwell continues to profess moral outrage over non-existent "child porno" stories, yet posts snapshots on his blog of nude, underage girls? A recent picture he posted of a 16-year-old with her finger inserted in her body absolutely IS child pornography, as defined by United States law.
