Thomas Churchwell. I just saw that ream of posts you wrote this morning. Your fantastical lie that I am "bullying" your family - who I don't know and couldn't care less about - shows that you really are nuts, if you really believe what you wrote.
Your blogs are not only perverse and deeply offensive, they are cruelly self-serving. What comes across to strangers is not that I am any of the terrible things you write about me, but that you are a hateful, narcissistic nutcase.
I, and others, are the true victims here. We don't have to prove a thing to the likes of you, but maybe it's time for you prove a few things to us.
Let's see your psychiatric report again.
Let's see your prison record, showing exactly what crime you were locked up for.
Let's see proof that you blinded the man you called Gumby, because if you did, you are a crumb, for sure.
Original Post: Churchwell has said more than once that he knows when something is morally wrong but he does it anyway. In other words, he makes a conscious choice to harm people. At other times, when he seems to realize that he might be held accountable for his behavior, he will say that he's nuts. He recently wrote that "17 psychiatrists" examined him and failed to agree on exactly what is wrong with him!
Cyber bullies like Churchwell typically portray themselves as downtrodden victims. He would have you believe that everyone he has met online is a hater and everyone is out to get him. His first solo blog was titled 'The Haters.' And who were these haters? He had a list of people (I wasn't on it yet) who had rubbed him the wrong way on the CourtTV board and on his banned blog at Cape Cod Today. Mostly, they were posters who had called him on his many lies. So, he opened a blog about them and wrote nasty allegations about them, and called them the haters, but he never supplied any proof whatsoever of the allegations. The truth became evident as disgusted readers headed for the hills in less than a month, realizing that HE was the hater, HE was the victimizer and liar.
One of his frequent lies is that he is being stalked. There is a grain of hilarity in that one, when you consider that stalking victims are the antithesis of Churchwell. People who are stalked generally are famous, beautiful, accomplished, or possess other qualities that a stalker perceives as meaning the victim is better than himself. Take the nutcase who stalked and murdered John Lennon. He idolized Lennon for his talent and fame but saw himself as a zero. He wanted to be famous like Lennon. He was jealous of him. In his marginal mind, all he could do was murder him. Churchwell is a stalker on the Internet. Since he started stalking my blogs two years ago, he has bragged about calling every gallery in my town, and the Chamber of Commerce, trying to get my address. Last May, he posted a defiled version of a commercial photograph of mine on websites, and wrote: "Do you know the photographer of this crappy photo? Email me." In February of this year, he threatened to show up at my home. He actually posted the threat on his blog! In the post where he bragged about blinding the man he called 'Gumby', he threatened me: "Churchwell is coming to stop you." I reported him to the Police, of course. "Oh, he lives in that building for nutsos," they said. Churchwell has written reams of libel about my phone calls to the custodians of that building. They couldn't help his victims, because they had their hands full trying to deal with the disruption he was causing there, plus he had gone on his rent strike.
And where is Google in all of this? Given the awful truth that Google hosts blogs penned by terrorists, they couldn't care less about shutting down mere stalkers and bullies. Speaking out is the only thing that might help. Because if no one speaks out, if bloggers look away apathetically like sheep, the day will come when blogland will be run by marauding bullies and other sickos. It's a fact that many female bloggers already have given up blogging because of these losers.
As I already stated in this post, and elsewhere on the blog, he writes about non-existent attacks on his family. Even worse than the lies about his family are the posts in which he accuses me and other people of being thieves and pornographers. There is no truth to it, so why doesn't he stop? For one thing, he knows that nothing could more damaging to his victims than having this type of defamation on the Internet. It's the old Gestapo trick of accusing innocent people of sexual perversion, when they cannot be proved guilty of some other crime. We know why the Nazis did it: they hated Jews. Churchwell hates the world. He has the mindset of a thug.
Last year he stopped paying his government subsidized rent at SUS, and now he is about to be evicted. On the Web, however, he thinks he's a "big shot" because he beats up women. He's known as the creep, the tyrant, the loser who spends his days writing hateful lies about women. Some big shot!
In the end, it doesn't matter why he lies constantly, hates the world, exploits his family for libel, and is obsessed with stealing and child pornography. He has no right to malign, stalk, or libel anyone!
Your blogs are not only perverse and deeply offensive, they are cruelly self-serving. What comes across to strangers is not that I am any of the terrible things you write about me, but that you are a hateful, narcissistic nutcase.I, and others, are the true victims here. We don't have to prove a thing to the likes of you, but maybe it's time for you prove a few things to us.
Let's see your psychiatric report again.
Let's see your prison record, showing exactly what crime you were locked up for.
Let's see proof that you blinded the man you called Gumby, because if you did, you are a crumb, for sure.
Original Post: Churchwell has said more than once that he knows when something is morally wrong but he does it anyway. In other words, he makes a conscious choice to harm people. At other times, when he seems to realize that he might be held accountable for his behavior, he will say that he's nuts. He recently wrote that "17 psychiatrists" examined him and failed to agree on exactly what is wrong with him!
Cyber bullies like Churchwell typically portray themselves as downtrodden victims. He would have you believe that everyone he has met online is a hater and everyone is out to get him. His first solo blog was titled 'The Haters.' And who were these haters? He had a list of people (I wasn't on it yet) who had rubbed him the wrong way on the CourtTV board and on his banned blog at Cape Cod Today. Mostly, they were posters who had called him on his many lies. So, he opened a blog about them and wrote nasty allegations about them, and called them the haters, but he never supplied any proof whatsoever of the allegations. The truth became evident as disgusted readers headed for the hills in less than a month, realizing that HE was the hater, HE was the victimizer and liar.
One of his frequent lies is that he is being stalked. There is a grain of hilarity in that one, when you consider that stalking victims are the antithesis of Churchwell. People who are stalked generally are famous, beautiful, accomplished, or possess other qualities that a stalker perceives as meaning the victim is better than himself. Take the nutcase who stalked and murdered John Lennon. He idolized Lennon for his talent and fame but saw himself as a zero. He wanted to be famous like Lennon. He was jealous of him. In his marginal mind, all he could do was murder him. Churchwell is a stalker on the Internet. Since he started stalking my blogs two years ago, he has bragged about calling every gallery in my town, and the Chamber of Commerce, trying to get my address. Last May, he posted a defiled version of a commercial photograph of mine on websites, and wrote: "Do you know the photographer of this crappy photo? Email me." In February of this year, he threatened to show up at my home. He actually posted the threat on his blog! In the post where he bragged about blinding the man he called 'Gumby', he threatened me: "Churchwell is coming to stop you." I reported him to the Police, of course. "Oh, he lives in that building for nutsos," they said. Churchwell has written reams of libel about my phone calls to the custodians of that building. They couldn't help his victims, because they had their hands full trying to deal with the disruption he was causing there, plus he had gone on his rent strike.
And where is Google in all of this? Given the awful truth that Google hosts blogs penned by terrorists, they couldn't care less about shutting down mere stalkers and bullies. Speaking out is the only thing that might help. Because if no one speaks out, if bloggers look away apathetically like sheep, the day will come when blogland will be run by marauding bullies and other sickos. It's a fact that many female bloggers already have given up blogging because of these losers.As I already stated in this post, and elsewhere on the blog, he writes about non-existent attacks on his family. Even worse than the lies about his family are the posts in which he accuses me and other people of being thieves and pornographers. There is no truth to it, so why doesn't he stop? For one thing, he knows that nothing could more damaging to his victims than having this type of defamation on the Internet. It's the old Gestapo trick of accusing innocent people of sexual perversion, when they cannot be proved guilty of some other crime. We know why the Nazis did it: they hated Jews. Churchwell hates the world. He has the mindset of a thug.
Last year he stopped paying his government subsidized rent at SUS, and now he is about to be evicted. On the Web, however, he thinks he's a "big shot" because he beats up women. He's known as the creep, the tyrant, the loser who spends his days writing hateful lies about women. Some big shot!
In the end, it doesn't matter why he lies constantly, hates the world, exploits his family for libel, and is obsessed with stealing and child pornography. He has no right to malign, stalk, or libel anyone!
