Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Thomas Tarquin Churchwell and Kids

Attention Greta Wire Readers: I heard that Thomas Churchwell, a stalker on my blog, is saying that the author of my blog is Susan a/k/a Suzi a/k/a SuziQ. That is a stupid lie. My name is Scarlett and I am the only author.


Update: After flooding my inbox with more than 300 lurid comments this week, Thomas Churchwell is trying to dupe the readers of Greta Wire. If readers of that forum can stomach a factual account of his shady doings, they are welcome to read my blog in its entirety.

Thomas Churchwell has spent three years writing malicious lies about me. It started after I befriended him on a message board in 2006 (fortunately, we never met). He seemed to be grieving the murdered socialite Christa Worthington and I felt sorry for him. But after talking with him for about three weeks, I found out that his long ago "romance" with Ms. Worthington had been brief, that she had let him stay in her apartment out of pity, because he had been living in a flophouse, and that it wasn't long before she threw his belongings into the street, sick of his mooching. All of this is documented in Maria Flook's book Invisible Eden. I caught him in other lies. For example, he told me that he was a famous retired magician, when, in fact, he was living in a lock-down building in Queens, his only source of income a small, monthly disability check that pays his rent in that building, and nowhere else, because he savagely beat a man and blinded him, and was declared too anti-social to live on his own. When I discovered the appalling truth about him, I ended our chats, and he began his attacks on me the next day.

This page was started by me as a defense blog against his libel. I also hoped it would serve as a helpful resource for other victims of cyber bullying. I have tried to ignore the hundreds of defamatory posts that Thomas Churchwell has written about me in his relentless attempts to destroy my reputation and photography career, but trying to ignore his abuse has never stopped it. For this reason, I have periodically added posts to this page, and tonight I felt it was necessary to do so again, after he spewed malicious lies about me on Greta's very public blog. Fortunately, I am blessed with a wonderful support system.

Here's something you can take to the bank. My blog has never been written by Susan/Suzi. Along with the obvious fact that her writing style and mine are completely different, there are one or two posts here that are not exactly flattering to her ( I wrote them after SHE libeled me last fall). If you know the combative Susan/Suzi/Sammie/Deb from the Greta Wire blog, then you already know that she has an ego as large as the Internet and would never write anything unflattering about herself.


The following is the post that actually belongs with the above post title. Thomas Churchwell would like to see it slide on down the page.


In a blog post this morning, Churchwell wrote this malicious lie again:

"How funny that this one hater from North Carolina... Her writing about me as a 10 year old having sex with my teacher is writing child porn and just because I know that and I post what she does doesn’t make me a person interested in child porn."



Here are the facts. I never wrote a story about Churchwell having sex with a teacher. Several years ago his old blog fan KMA, who I don't know, wrote a fantasy post on Churchwell's blog that concerned a teacher spanking Churchwell.

Update: I found the post written by KMA. Churchwell posted it on this site. Be warned, if you go there, it's a child porn website. How did I find it so fast? Simple. I typed "kiddie porn + Tarquin Churchwell" in a search bar and it came up on the first page:

(click on image to enlarge)



Curiously, the post has been altered. It now contains the same grammatical errors and misspellings found in Churchwell's disjointed writings. Which suggests that Churchwell altered it himself. It reads like it was written by someone impaired by drugs, alcohol or mental illness. Not my style of writing:

"Upon further investigation into Tarquins (sic) early years it seems his mother was called to the principals (sic) office when Tar was a mere 10yo. (sic) Seems Tar had sex with his 4th grade teacher & was being sent home w/mom. Mom called Dad to come home and handle the uncomfortable challange (sic) of discussing what happened at school. Dad & Tar when (sic) for a ride to talk about what happened. Dad said it was normal to have fantisies (sic) about some of his teachers "but perhaps it was not such a good thing to act them out and maybe we should all just try & put this all ~behind~ us and go home and hopefully he best not do it again." Tar said: "Gee thanks for understanding Dad." And they went home. As they were pulling into the driveway Tar says "Hey Dad, do you think you can give me a ride over to my friend Billys (sic) house?" Whereupon his Dad said "Why son why not take your bike & ride it over there?" To which little Tarquin replies: "Yeah, well I would Dad... But my butt is really hurting." And now Tarquin wants to 'give it back' - what he learned at school - To anyone who crosses him or Ha Ha - "Lies". Where (sic) on to you fella -You are in need of serious help. You know: 'Unresolvedchildhood' (sic) "issues" still linger. The more you dish it out the more we gonna put it wherethe (sic) sun don't shine!"


Now here is Churchwell again, still on the same site, impersonating KMA in a second comment. You can tell he's excited:

"I'm KMA. I own Cape Cod today. A very successfull (sic) online website about Cape Cod. I let people write about anything they want. I write about children sex. I love writing about children having sex. Come to Cape Cod today and read some of my stories."

I never met KMA, but he surely was not an owner of Cape Cod Today. However, Churchwell had a beef with Cape Cod Today, after the editor there shut down his blog for TOS violations. Evidently, he decided to slur KMA and the editor in one swoop.

His post today, along with the altered post on the child porn site, proves that he has been lying all along. Lying about me for attention. Attention Thomas Churchwell shouldn't want, since his writings broadcast to the world that he can't stop fixating on children. Everyone expects him to be classless, ignorant and a hater of women, that's a given. But I would suggest keeping child exploitation and writing about children in a sexual way out of his public displays of hate. To the world, this says that he may be a pedophile.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Hate Blogger THOMAS CHURCHWELL Needs An Intervention


To his PSYCHIATRIST: I remember you viewed my site last summer. I hope you will do so again.

Your patient's irrational behavior has worsened since he was removed from SUS, and as one of his cyber victims, I have to ask you again to do something about him. I realize personality disorders cannot be cured. There is no medical miracle for Thomas Churchwell's problem, but surely he can be controlled somehow?

Your patient targeted me in 2006 simply because I talked to him on the Internet for two or three weeks. When I realized he was a liar, I ended the conversations, and he began his attacks on me the next day. He seems to think that he is a professional photographer and that I am a fraud when, in fact, it's the other way around. He also thinks that he is
entitled to destroy my blog, my photography business, and threaten my life. My immediate request is that you do something about him, be it stronger medication, or putting him to work, so that he doesn't have so many idle hours to act out. You can contact me at bloggingright@yahoo.com.


Thomas Churchwell likes to say that those old parody blogs, published more than a year ago in response to his hate writings about women, are the reason for all of his problems. Don't buy into the BS. Churchwell was attacking bloggers years before the parody blogs were ever published.

As for the other hater, I don't know what part, if any, that Susan played in his post today. She may be too busy disrupting the Greta blog to make trouble for me. But I imagine she is belly laughing over this. She and Churchwell are very much alike, after all. The only real difference between them is education.

To everyone else, please learn from my experience. What happened to me is a lesson to anyone who thinks trust should be handed out on the Internet like candy. I trusted Churchwell and Susan, when I met them online, and look where it got me.
Be careful out there.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Harassing Blog Comments Faked By Thomas Churchwell Today

First, I want to remind readers that I have a new blog. It is about me--not the delusional version of me as concocted by the woman hater. I am blogging there as often as I can, aiming to keep my posts interesting and worth your time. I truly appreciate your support and hope you will visit often!

Here's the link.

That was the good news. The bad news is that Thomas Churchwell, wanting you to know that he is still a bully and stalker, today faked blog comments in my name again on his wordpress site, according to his post in the Google Reader.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

I Have A New Blog!

Ladies and gentlemen, over the weekend I moved many of the posts on this page to a brand new location. The link is at the bottom of the post.

A couple of months ago this blog had an identity crisis, when I wrote a few humorous posts, as an experiment, and the result was a confusing mix of funny posts and serious rebuttals against Thomas Churchwell's libel.

This blog will stay here as a resource and archive. I appreciate most of you who have read my posts. I'm especially thankful to those who have posted comments here.

Link to new site.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Thomas Churchwell Threatens Lies To Yahoo About Scarlett

Yahoo: if you are reading this post, feel free to review my site in its entirety. Thomas Churchwell sent threats to my blog stating that he is going to "get Yahoo" to ban me from the Internet. Yes, and he even said that Yahoo is conspiring with him.

To the bully: When I reported your copyright theft of my photography to Yahoo (which owns Flickr) in 2007, they told me that they already had 3 complaints about you. That is a fact.

Today you gave yourself away. In the Google Reader I saw that you wrote on your hate site, in reference to your libel about me: "I will be frack..." (must have meant 'frank') "...that I'm having fun." This underscores the disgusting truth about you, that you are a bully writing horrible lies about me for kicks. There is no other reason for what you are doing, and now you have admitted it.

LEAVE THIS BLOG AND DON'T COME BACK.

Stop trying to ruin my photography business and my blog. Leave me alone.

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Thomas Churchwell Puts Words In Scarlett's Mouth She Never Said

Thomas Churchwell, about your recent Wordpress libel posts, stop putting quotation marks around words I didn't say. I NEVER had those conversations that you're posting on your blog. Not with you, or anyone else.

Regarding your allegations that I "stole pictures off the Internet," you know that is a lie.



You know the words "photo theft" mean disregarding a copyright signature or warning about posting a picture—such as the warning I gave you to stop posting my commercial photography in 2007.

The pictures you asked me to find for you had no signatures, no warnings, and no copyrights. Further, I never posted those pictures on any site. You did.

Readers, Thomas Churchwell is psychotic. He put his psychiatrist's evaluation on his own blog last summer.

He has the credibility of a gnat.


Recapping, Churchwell began his attacks on me the day after I ended those short-lived conversations with him in 2006. Being the vengeful type, he published my commercial still-life photograph of a watch and Christmas ornament on at least four websites, including Photobucket, Flickr, LiveJournal and Blogger. Also, he defaced my Christmas photography and published his defiled version alongside my copyrighted original. When I found out, I asked him to remove both images. He refused. He then filed a bogus claim on Photobucket against my copyright, which is a crime, and libeled me all over the Internet as a thief of my own photography.

Recently he admitted on his site that I was the photographer of that image.

Churchwell, you had a "career" as a pickpocket in a strip bar, according to your own posts, and you stole the copyright of my commercial photography. People think you are a LOON.

And stop stalking my site. Seeing you refresh my page dozens of times a day (at all hours) is very odd and makes me wonder if there isn’t something better that you can occupy your time with. Perhaps getting a job?

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Loose Ends


For the most part, I dislike FAQs. They’re generally filled with pointless information such as meticulous lists of the author’s favorite foods, as if anyone cares other than family and friends. However, the difference between the average everyday FAQ and this one is that people actually asked me this stuff. Since today is the last day of 2008, I think it's a good time to tie up loose ends. So, here you go.


1. Why do you write anonymously? I’ll never take anything you say seriously unless you’re willing to put your full name on it.

For all you know, everyone writes anonymously, but you just believe them when they sign their posts ‘Sarah Goodbody.’

For me, the ideas presented are what is important. I couldn't care less what the name is. Besides, with cyber bullies and stalkers prowling the Internet, it's just plain dumb to blog under your real full name.

Artists and authors have been using pen names and pseudonyms for generations now. Baiters like Thomas Tarquin Churchwell should stop acting like this is some odd phenomenon.


Mark Twain. Richard Bachman. Meatloaf. Prince. Madonna. Lemony Snicket. J.K Rowling. Fiona Apple. Nicolas Bourbaki. George Eliot. Irving Berlin. Bono. Cher. Elvis Costello. Mick Jagger. Rudyard Kipling. Spike Lee. Jerry Lewis. George Orwell. Lewis Carroll. Sting.

All these names are either partially accurate or completely fake.

Of course, the fact of the matter is that I have revealed my real first name in this blog's title. Anyone wanting more than that should show me that they can be trusted.

2. What was your motivation for starting this site?

Is there anyone who doesn't know why I started this site? I started it to set the record straight about the malicious lies that Thomas Tarquin Churchwell has been writing about me every day for more than two years.

3. For a long time you didn't allow comments on your site. Why?

Well, I think that’s pretty obvious, don’t you? Every time I allowed comments on my blog, I was bombarded with sick, unprintable anonymous comments written by Thomas Churchwell.

4. Have you become cynical about blogging?

No way!

One of the reasons I felt comfortable meeting other bloggers two years ago, was because I was under the assumption — and this theory required a leap of faith which required that I accept the innate goodness of man — that if an individual could tie words together and make a sentence that communicated a thought, it meant that he had adequate control over his mental faculties, that he was not crazy, or at least not dangerous, or at least medicated enough to be acceptable to society. I was so naive. Now I am wiser, but I still believe that most bloggers are nice people.

5. Do you think Thomas Churchwell will ever give up bullying?

I think that if he ever faces certain truths about himself, he might stop beating up women on the Internet.

Readers, I hope you will have much fun tonight! See you tomorrow.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Why Do Bullies Hate Women?

When I came home tonight after attending a dinner party where all the guests seemed normal, I started thinking about that phrase from the play "The Mourning Bride" by William Congreve, an English author of the early eighteenth century. You know the one: "Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned, nor hell a fury like a woman scorned." When you think of these few words, you automatically think of a woman who has been jilted by the one she loves and wants to viciously strike back. However, have you ever wondered how a bully responds, if he is the one who is jilted?

This thinking/wondering came about as a result of the cyber bully who trolls my blog and leaves disparaging, rude, libelous, abusive, and threatening comments. Sometimes this type of behavior accelerates into death threats, as it did with me. Most cyber bullies - 90% - are men. So, I started wondering just why do some men hate women to the extent that they'd do this.

I started doing some Googling and discovered, not to my surprise, that there's a lot out there on this topic. Some write about this phenomenon being the result of original sin when Eve took and ate the forbidden fruit and then blamed it on Adam. That fruit, by the way, was a symbol of knowledge, something that Adam couldn't supply. Some actually believe that this story is central to the oppression of women worldwide.

Did you know that the English language has 220 words (almost all derogatory) for a female and only 20 for a male (almost all complimentary). Consider the following: A 'master' exercises authority, whereas a 'mistress' is a so-called kept woman. The term 'sir' retains respect, while 'madam' refers to someone who keeps a brothel. A 'lord of all he surveys' is quite different from a 'lady of the streets', and the meaning of 'he's a professional' is generally understood differently from 'she's a professional'.

Susan Forward, PhD, a leading psychotherapist states: "Once we begin to examine the forces that drive the woman hater, we find that much of his abusive behavior is a cover-up for his anxiety about women. This man needs, as we all do, to feel safe. As adults most men fulfill these yearnings through physical intimacy, emotional sharing and parenting. But the woman hater finds these yearnings terribly frightening. He harbors a hidden belief that if he cares for a woman, she will then have the power to hurt him, to engulf him and to abandon him. Once he has invested her with these awesome and mythical powers, she becomes a fearful figure for him."

She goes on to explain that the woman hater's conflicting emotions of yearning and fear result in behaviors of hostility, aggression, contempt and cruelty. "Early childhood plays a role in contributing to this misogynistic behavior. In an ideal situation, a mother nurtures and is a boy’s primary source of comfort, while fathers help pull the boy away from mother so that he does not become overly dependent on her. If you look closely at the childhood of a woman hater, the father was probably either too passive to pull the boy from the mother, or he was a bully himself, and consequently, the boy had no option but to make his mother the center of his universe."

"Without realizing it, in adult life he transfers this dependency, as well as conflicts and fears that go with it, onto the woman in his life. The woman hater saw his mother as having the power to frustrate him, to withhold love from him, to smother him, to make him feel weak, or to make insatiable demands on him"—and as an adult he views women as having these same powers."

This partly explains why the cyber bully Thomas Churchwell hates women bloggers. The irony is that if he bumped into me on a street, and saw that I am not any of the things he writes about me, but that I am a nice, ordinary girl, he would run away shame-faced. Maybe. Of course, then he wouldn't mind meeting a new online target to assuage his childhood traumas.

I used to feel some sympathy towards this type of man because, no matter what, something terrible happened to him early that skewed his image of women. But now I believe that he doesn't deserve any sympathy except from his psychiatrist.

Monday, December 15, 2008

The Truth About Churchwell's "Photo Thief" Lie

Calling me a photo thief is an outrageous lie.

I have never stolen "pictures off the Internet". Why do you continue to write this lie? You have been attacking me without cause or provocation for more than two years.

On your blogs you brag that you are a "psycho." You have said more than once that "17 psychiatrists" all agree you're nuts. If this is true, you have no credibility. You can't be mentally ill, and at the same time, expect anyone to believe you, when you call me a photo thief. So, what is the point?

You can ponder that question, or not. As for me, I am blogging on my own blog. You drove me away from a blog I wrote last year. This time, you're not driving me away.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

About The Breaking News Blog


If anyone is interested, here's what I heard about the Breaking News parody blog. Currently it's closed, because someone flagged it as "spam." Which may mean sabotage, a hacker, or an overly zealous bot that goofed? The good news is, Thomas Tarquin Churchwell's phony allegations of the blog being a "hate site" was not the reason.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Monday, October 6, 2008

Susan Newton, Stop Your Libel

By Scarlett

Here is the revision of a comment I wrote on the Breaking News blog concerning a crackpot post by Susan Newton of San Rafael, California, with a few added points:

People are not stupid, Susan. They know you are having a major MELTDOWN, because you are afraid that you are losing your slap and slur partner on the blogs. Thomas Churchwell posted that he is going to stop blogging (the Internet should be so lucky) and you have come unglued.

In a pathetic attempt to please him, you have been libeling me a "hatemonger" "Southern bigot" and "alleged" photographer.

First, I don't hate anyone.

Secondly, in your post you launched a despicable attack on my dead father. A total stranger to you and an honorable man.

As for the third slur, I am a professional photographer. This is what I do for a LIVING. Got that?

Finally, you said I "tracked you down" in a hotel two years ago. There is a grain of hilarity in that one, given the unpleasant truth that you are a tracker from way back. Why do you want to believe that women are pursuing you? You posted that phone number on your blog and asked me to call, because you were dying to get the ball rolling on your ridiculing, obsessive chats about Thomas Churchwell.

You were obsessed with Churchwell and obsessed with me. In fact, if I didn't answer my phone, you would keep calling, until I did.

You must be a miserable person. And while I don't care what happens to you, for the sake of innocent people who encounter you on the Internet, especially women, you should resume therapy.


Leave me alone.
October 6, 2008 2:26 PM

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Thomas Tarquin Churchwell: Stop. Leave Me Alone

I do not know Thomas Tarquin Churchwell from Queens, NY and Portsmouth, New Hampshire, except as a bully on the Internet, and stalker of my blog. He enjoys seeing his name splashed across the Internet. I do not. I do not enjoy being cyber bullied, libeled and stalked. I have asked him to stop many times.

Please leave me alone. Go away. Stop blogging lies about me.

LEAVE ME ALONE.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Susan Newton Desperate For Thomas Churchwell's Love, Defames Scarlett

By Scarlett

I will address the lunatic post Susan Newton wrote this morning, but right now, I have to go to work. I'll set the record straight later.

Friday, August 1, 2008

Screenshot of Fake Comment

By Scarlett

From the Google Reader, this screenshot was posted by Thomas Churchwell on his blog July 30. An imposter wrote the first comment. The IP address is Susan's.

I never go to his blog.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Fake Comments in Scarlett's Name

By Scarlett

A screenshot in the Google Reader shows that you, Susan, apparently have been writing blog comments in my name on Thomas Churchwell's blog. I don't know why you're doing this, but please stop.

I never go to his blogs or yours.

Sunday, July 13, 2008

To Churchwell's Psychiatrist

Yesterday, your patient, Thomas Tarquin Churchwell, stated on his blog that he is a "psycho and a liar". Today he repeated his often published lie that I and another blogger have threatened his family. I am sure you would advise me to ignore him, and I am trying. I just thought you should know that he is still writing malicious libel about women, and is still fixated on child pornography. I understand you are monitoring his Internet listings.

Monday, May 5, 2008

Triviality Threatens

Thomas Churchwell. I just saw that ream of posts you wrote this morning. Your fantastical lie that I am "bullying" your family - who I don't know and couldn't care less about - proves that you really are nuts, if you believe what you wrote.

Your blogs are not only perverse and deeply offensive, they are cruelly egocentric. What comes across to strangers is not that I am any of the terrible things you write about me, but that you are a hateful, narcissistic nutcase.

I and other bloggers are the true victims here. We don't have to prove a thing to the likes of you. Maybe it's time for you prove a few things to us.

Let's see your psychiatric report again.

Let's see your prison record, showing the crime for which you were locked up.

Let's see proof that you blinded the man you called Gumby, because if you did that, you are a crumb, for sure.

Original Post:

Thomas Churchwell has said more than once that he knows when something he does is wrong, but he does it anyway. At other times, when he seems to think that he may be held accountable for his behavior, he will say he's crazy. He recently wrote that "17 psychiatrists" examined him and failed to agree on exactly what is wrong with him.

Cyber bullies like to portray themselves as downtrodden victims. Some of you may remember that Churchwell's first blog was called 'The Haters.' Who were these so-called haters? He had a list of bloggers' names. Most of them were bloggers on Cape Cod Today who had caught him in multiple lies. So, he opened a blog about them, wrote nasty allegations about them, and called them "the haters," yet he never posted a single shred of proof.

In addition to falsely portraying himself as a victim, Churchwell likes to say he is being stalked. There is a grain of hilarity in that one, when you consider stalking victims generally are famous, beautiful, accomplished, or possess some other quality perceived by a stalker as enviable. Take the nutcase who stalked and murdered John Lennon. He idolized Lennon for his talent and fame but saw himself as a zero. He wanted to be famous like Lennon. He was jealous. In his marginal mind, all he could do was kill him. Churchwell is a stalker on the blogosphere. Since he began stalking me two years ago, he has bragged about calling every gallery in my town, and the Chamber of Commerce, in an effort to find out where I live. Last May, he posted a defiled version of a commercial photograph of mine on several websites with the caption: "Do you know the photographer of this crappy photo? Email me." In February of this year, he threatened to show up at my home. Yes, he actually posted the threat on his blog. In the disturbing post where he bragged about blinding the man he called 'Gumby', he threatened me: "I am coming to stop you." Of course, I reported his threat to the Police. "Oh, he lives in that building for nutsos," the detective sighed. Churchwell has written reams of lies about my two phone calls to the custodians of that building, who unfortunately couldn't help me and his other victims, because they had their hands full trying to deal with the disruption he was causing there.

As I stated above, Churchwell likes to rant about imaginary attacks on his family. Even worse are the posts in which he accuses me and other bloggers of being thieves and pornographers. There is no truth to it, so why doesn't he stop? For one thing, he knows nothing could more damaging than having this type of defamation on the Internet. It's the old Gestapo trick of accusing innocent people of sexual perversion, when they cannot be proved guilty of some other crime. We know why the Nazi did this; they hated Jews. Tarquin Churchwell seems to hate the world. He has the mindset of a thug.

Why hasn't Google shut down his blogs? Given the awful truth that Google hosts blogsites penned by terrorists, they couldn't care less about shutting down woman hating bullies. Speaking out is the only thing that might help. Because if no one speaks out, if bloggers continue to look away apathetically like sheep, the day will come when blogland will be run by marauding bullies and other sickos. Many female bloggers already have given up blogging because of these losers.

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Handcuffs For Thomas Tarquin Churchwell

So you're threatening to meet with the Carolina police? Do that! They know you've stalked women on blogs for two years and stupidly bragged on your blogs that you tried many times to get my address. They know about your outrageous libel, your sick fantasy posts about a certain minor child, your astonishing death threats against me and others, your mental instability and history of violence. They're waiting for you.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Is He Sick Or Slick?

Is Thomas Churchwell sick or slick? Is he crazy, or writing vicious posts about me with a wink and a smirk? The answer to this question might be known by his court-appointed psychiatrist. But even if he is nutty as a fruitcake, as he would have us believe in a recent blog post, mental illness does not excuse libel and threats. "I can't help what I do," is a pathetically stupid alibi. If he really cannot control his hateful impulses, he should be locked up and medicated. Otherwise, as long as he remains "free" to smear innocent women on the Internet, it is presumed that he knows what he is doing, and therefore, is accountable for every word he writes.

Let's hope his psychiatrist and guardian will take a look at his blogs.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

The Truth About Churchwell's "Child Porno" Lie

March 18, 2008 (revised): Regarding Churchwell's repugnant "child porno writer" lie, here is exactly what I wrote about him on that long ago satire blog:

"I started masturbating at a very young age, before 5th grade, maybe younger."

Churchwell has written reams of lies about that one benign sentence. He never actually quotes the sentence, of course, and never mentions the post in which it appeared three years ago. He just spends his days in blogland screaming: "Child porno!"

This might be a snoozer, but if you are interested to know the context, it came from a post imagining his "back story." In keeping with the tone of my blog, which was satire, I wrote a post describing what he might have been like when he was a kid, teenager and young man, decades before he became a nightmare on the blogs. Futilely, I was exploring the question: How did Thomas Churchwell become the weirdly sex-obsessed, woman hating cyber bully that he is today?

Here is the entire post, as I posted it three years ago:

Fans ask me all the time about my sex life. I started masturbating at a very young age, before 5th grade, maybe younger. I remember being aroused by fictional characters. Like, sometimes I would fantasize about tying up the tooth fairy and socking her in the mouth. Then for about two years I had dreams about a groundhog. Every February, I got excited when he saw his shadow. I outgrew the woodland creature thing and developed a thing for fat girls. Huge breasts, underarm rolls and bloated bellies! One of my favorite dreams had a fat supermodel knocking on my window in the middle of the night. We'd take her limo to McDonald's, spend shit loads of money, and stuff ourselves on cheeseburgers till dawn. My last girlfriend was old. I called her Angel. I lived with her for 3 months and that was two months too long! It's been a while since I moved out, but I can't stop thinking about the couple that lived next door. Every Saturday night, I could hear them spanking each other. I love being spanked, anywhere, any time! I don't know why, but I am fucking obsessed with having people spank me. I found out today that I like to grab my own ass and spank it when I'm in the shower.

That's it. A silly, forgettable post that was meant to satirize Churchwell's own loony writings. Clearly, there was nothing in it that a rational person would call "pornographic".

Quote from a victim resource site:

"Character assasination is one of the bully's most important techniques. He demonizes his victims. Everyone he attacks "deserves" it. His victims are perverts, liars, thieves, whatever tag he thinks he can make stick. (Actually he does this, whether he thinks it will stick or not). Then he pounds his victims again and again. It doesn't matter that the accusations are not true. It is the technique of repetition, time and again, that works in the bully's mind. And once a victim is on the bully's list, he will attack her relentlessly."

That description fits Churchwell to a T, doesn't it?

His ranting about imaginary "child porno" is libelous and sick. Some have described it as a pathological fix. Which seems to be the case, because he has accused at least three other bloggers of the same thing! By making these accusations for years, he has aroused suspicion that he likes child pornography, and could it be that he really does? And that, like a moth to a flame, his obsessive rants reflect an irresistible attraction?

I don't know the answer to that question, but some of you are aware that he visits child porn websites. Here is a link to one site:

Second Life Herald: Virtual Child Porn in Second Life www.secondlifeherald.com/slh/2004/12/virtual_child_p.html

Churchwell posted on the above site as "KMA" (a reader on his old blog), but he registered in his own name and in his own highly recognizable writing style, ironically posted a quasi sex story about himself as a child. In addition, he has concocted dozens of sexually sick blogs about me and other women, written two sick blogs about Susan's minor son, and sent emails to her, and to me, describing fantasy sex acts with this child in horrifying detail. Sounds like more revelations for his psychiatrist, doesn't it?

Update June 1, 2009: Another year has passed, and the liar is still at it. Does anyone else find it disgusting and also telling that Thomas Churchwell continues to profess moral outrage over non-existent "child porno" stories, yet posts snapshots on his blog of nude, underage girls? A recent picture he posted of a 16-year-old with her finger inserted in her body absolutely IS child pornography, as defined by United States law.

Friday, February 29, 2008

Thomas Churchwell Is a Liar and a Loon

I don't want to address Churchwell, and I know that long time readers of the blogs share my aversion. I am fine, though. This is not like last year, when his vicious blogs made me so ill that I ended up in a hospital with pleurisy. I am stronger this time.

I'll confirm what you already know. Everything Thomas Churchwell writes on the subject of me (and many other people) is libel. There has never been any truth in anything he says.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Thomas Churchwell Lies About "Truce," Defames Photographer

Thomas Churchwell, you tried to trick me and all of the Internet with your "truce" posts. Please get rid of your "photo thief" blog, your "Churchwell Continues" libel posts on AOL and all your other defamatory posts about me.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

What Part of GO AWAY Does He Not Understand?

It is inevitable that when a person is repeatedly called a "THIEF", she will set the record straight. Thomas Churchwell counted on this, when he wrote that horrible post about me today.

I'm not like The Amazing Tarquin, as he once called himself, with a pseudo-career as a magician and pickpocket. I am not a thief.

He should be more concerned about his recent threats to beat up bloggers, than with his treasure trove of public domain pictures from two years ago.

Friday, February 22, 2008

Your Threat

Thomas Churchwell, I just read your threat in the listings. Let me make this clear. I'm not sure what you mean by "Churchwell is coming to stop you" and "Here I come" but I only know one way to interpret that, and if you walk into my yard, I will call the police. Got it? You will be arrested for trespassing, and for making threats on the Internet and for some other thing about crossing state lines. It involves the FBI. If you're trying to terrorize me, that, in itself, is a crime.

LEAVE ME ALONE.

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

You're The One Living In A Mental Home

Thomas Churchwell, or Tarquin Churchwell, I'm not going to defend myself every time you libel me. You would like that, because you are only happy when you are goading people with lies and getting a reaction.

As you know, I have never posted anything about your daughter, or your parents, and I certainly never threatened them.

You often use your family as props in your libel attacks on bloggers, yet you seem totally unconcerned what your family will think of you, when they see your disgusting blogs. You have no regard for anyone, not even for own your family.

By the way, your phone calls to the galleries in my town, and calling the Chamber of Commerce, along with the other things that you have done to try to find me, IS STALKING. So, stop it.

Leave me alone.

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Stop Blaming Me, Tarquin Churchwell

Blaming me for other blogs is ludicrous. The fact is, you've made so many enemies in your year of blogging, the author of those blogs could be anyone at all. Stop looking for an easy target.

Saturday, October 20, 2007

It's Not My IP, Tarquin Churchwell

By Scarlett

In reference to Tarquin Churchwell's two posts about me this morning, he is mistaken. I did not visit your blogs this morning, Tarquin. I have not read your blogs since April. Secondly, everyone knows you have IP meters. Do you think a person who is up to something sneaky, would go to your blog, then go to another blog bearing your name, then return to the first blog, knowing all the time they were being tracked? You should know that is a ridiculous scenario.

Hope everybody is doing well. Bye Bye!