Many Women Are Stalked

This is the face of a victim. To read her story, click here.

Three Years Later...Churchwell Still Spewing Lies About Old Phone Message

Update! So much for giving it the old college try. Last week, I closed the comment section on this blog, hoping that would end Thomas Churchwell's stalking. It didn't. He just took his stalking show on the road to my other blog.

You can read some of his abuse here.

Today, he went back to Gretawire to post more of the same, evidently wanting readers of that blog to know that being a liar, stalker and cyber bully are the only things he knows how to do.

Is there anyone left in blogland who doesn't know that Thomas Churchwell is a stalker? He proved he is a stalker by playing that old phone message on the Internet for three years. What kind of person does something like that? A normal man doesn't write grotesque sexual lies about a woman and broadcast her phone message on the Internet. A normal man doesn't rape a woman's soul by posting her pictures, after she has asked him to stop. Has he no shame? What does his psychiatrist make of his behavior?

As for the libel he posted on GW today, it was flagged, which automatically threw any replies into 'comment moderation.' Here was one reply:

"The wonderful Scarlett spent a couple of weeks chatting on the Internet with this creep back in 2006. When she realized he was a liar, she ended the chats. But Churchwell wasn't about to let her go. The next day, he started attacking her on his blog. He has never stopped.

To read more about his stalking, go here.

Scarlett is not his only victim. There have been others, but Scarlett received the brunt of his abuse, because she had conversations with him.

As for that old phone message that the hate hobbyist keeps posting links to on Greta's blog, does he think people are too stupid to comprehend what Scarlett was saying? Really? Here is the gist: Scarlett was upset because Churchwell had been saying that she was Susan. Susan (Suzi) was writing a nasty blog about him at the time (incidentally, it was the first blog written about him) and Scarlett had nothing to do with it. She didn't like being accused of writing Susan's nasty blog.

He cut off the end of the message, when she said, "You should check yourself into a hospital." You can hear the first syllable of "hospital"; the rest of the word was snipped. But even though he snipped it (and will snip the entire sentence, after reading this), he left his cackle. Here was a woman who clearly was upset, but was trying to help him, and he was laughing at her!

Then, he began to stalk her, while telling all of blogland that she was stalking him! If you have read Churchwell's appalling, blabber-mouth account of his life, then you know that no woman would stalk Thomas Churchwell!

He has played her phone message on the Internet for 3 years. That's a long time to obsess over a woman who wants nothing to do with him. What does this say about him? It says he is a bully and a stalker."

That comment didn't make it into GW due to Churchwell's comment geting flagged. I wrote this post to set the record straight.

For more truth, go here: http://churchwelldumpingground.com/

Blog Comments Closing

As the victim of a stalker, I have read a lot on the subject of cyber stalking. I have learned that experts have differing opinions as to whether it's better to speak out against a stalker's lies, or ignore them completely.

The general consensus is slightly tipped toward silence, the theory being that if you respond to a stalker, he will take it as encouragement; whereas, if you say nothing, he may go away eventually.

I can't fathom Churchwell going away, because stalking is just about the only thing he does each day.

I can't picture him being anything in life but a stalker, although wouldn't it be fantastic if he proved me wrong?

For now, I'm closing the comment section on this blog to give myself some relief from his harassment.

If you care to read the abuse that he has been sending to this blog, here's a link:

http://churchwelldumpingground.blogspot.com/

A Pile Of Evidence

March 17- This morning, Thomas Churchwell accused me of emailing one of the underage girls who recently posed for lewd pictures in his apartment. Sending the girl a warning might be advisable, given his claim that she is just 16, but I did not email her.

As a person who rejects reality on a daily basis, Thomas Churchwell spends his days writing cruel, jealous lies about other bloggers. When not writing lies and taking snapshots of teenagers in their underpants, he is idle. He has no apparent goal in life other than to type his favorite word "hate" a gazillion times before he dies.

He would have you believe that I am classless, ignorant and criminally-minded like him, but, in fact, I am a nice woman (though not a pushover). I loved a man who struggled with manic depression. I don't hate anyone. I am a college graduate and hold an upper graduate degree in the fine arts. My friends say I'm pretty (though I often don't believe them), I work hard as a photographer and have a relationship with a nice man who has made something of himself. I am repulsed by men who bully women.

Unlike Churchwell, I've never been in jail, or beaten or blinded anyone, or been a mental patient diagnosed by 17 psychiatrists, or had children who I abandoned (he denies the existence of two of his children, yet his ex-girlfriend says there are three); I have never loafed through life attacking innocent people on the Internet. This is Thomas Churchwell's resume, the only one he has.

A man who attacks a woman physically or verbally is a creep. There are no exceptions and no excuses.

In the Google Reader, he posted this today:

"My wordpress blog was successfully hacked and taken over by cyber bully Scarlett S and I reported it last week. She seemed to manage to get in and write horrible things pretending to be me to justify her writing hatred on her site about me and my business."

No wonder people call Thomas Churchwell a nasty liar. First of all, I don't know how to "hack" a blog, and secondly, I haven't been to his awful blogs in more than two years. He threatened to hack MY blog a week ago. That is a fact. Thirdly, he doesn't work. Let's be clear about his Wordpress hate site. He closed it himself after he published his death threats. Now, he is trying to disavow even writing them.

I am going to post one of Thomas Churchwell's recent death threats on my blog. The reason I am putting it here is to assist the police, who are being inundated with links to my blog, according to Churchwell. The mayor of my town, who Churchwell promises to contact soon, will no doubt be interested in his threats, as will the FBI.

He has written literally hundreds, if not thousands, of defamation posts about me. He floods this inbox, and my other inbox, with abuse every day. But death threats are a whole different ball game. I have a pile of his threats from this week alone. A pile of evidence.

You see, I found out that police rarely do anything about a stalker, until he shows up at his victim's home, or kills her. I am not daunted, however, because Thomas Churchwell has been broadcasting his brand of terrorism to the world for years, and sooner or later, he may link my blog to someone who will bring him to justice for threatening my life.

Death threat from his Wordpress site: I would shoot her until the gun was empty Mar 9, 2009 from CHURCHWELL by churchwell

A fan emailed me and ask me what I would do if I found out where she lived. My response is: “I would shoot her 1000 times even after she was dead I would continue to shoot.” March 10, 2009 1:07 PM

Hate Blogger THOMAS CHURCHWELL Needs An Intervention

To his PSYCHIATRIST: I remember you viewed my site last summer. I hope you will do so again.

Your patient's irrational behavior has worsened since he was removed from SUS, and as one of his cyber victims, I have to ask you again to do something about him. I realize personality disorders cannot be cured. There is no medical miracle for Thomas Churchwell's problem, but surely he can be controlled somehow?

Your patient targeted me in 2006 simply because I talked to him on the Internet for two or three weeks. When I realized he was a liar, I ended the conversations, and he began his attacks on me the next day. He seems to think that he is a professional photographer and that I am a fraud when, in fact, it's the other way around. He also thinks that he is entitled to destroy my blog, my photography business, and threaten my life. My immediate request is that you do something about him, be it stronger medication, or putting him to work, so that he doesn't have so many idle hours to act out. You can contact me at bloggingright@yahoo.com.

Thomas Churchwell likes to say that those old parody blogs, published more than a year ago in response to his hate writings about women, are the reason for all of his problems. Don't buy into the BS. Churchwell was attacking bloggers years before the parody blogs were ever published.

As for the other hater, I don't know what part, if any, that Susan played in his post today. She may be too busy disrupting the Greta blog to make trouble for me. But I imagine she is belly laughing over this. She and Churchwell are very much alike, after all. The only real difference between them is education.

To everyone else, please learn from my experience. What happened to me is a lesson to anyone who thinks trust should be handed out on the Internet like candy. I trusted Churchwell and Susan, when I met them online, and look where it got me. Be careful out there.

Harassing Blog Comments Faked By Thomas Churchwell Today

First, I want to remind readers that I have a new blog. It is about me--not the delusional version of me as concocted by the woman hater. I am blogging there as often as I can, aiming to keep my posts interesting and worth your time. I truly appreciate your support and hope you will visit often!

Here's the link.

That was the good news. The bad news is that Thomas Churchwell, wanting you to know that he is still a bully and stalker, today faked blog comments in my name again on his wordpress site, according to his post in the Google Reader.

Thomas Churchwell Threatens Lies To Yahoo About Scarlett

Yahoo: if you are reading this post, feel free to review my site in its entirety. Thomas Churchwell sent threats to my blog stating that he is going to "get Yahoo" to ban me from the Internet. Yes, and he even said that Yahoo is conspiring with him.

To the bully: When I reported your copyright theft of my photography to Yahoo (which owns Flickr) in 2007, they told me that they already had 3 complaints about you. That is a fact.

Today you gave yourself away. In the Google Reader I saw that you wrote on your hate site, in reference to your libel about me: "I will be frack..." (must have meant 'frank') "...that I'm having fun." This underscores the disgusting truth about you, that you are a bully writing horrible lies about me for kicks. There is no other reason for what you are doing, and now you have admitted it.

LEAVE THIS BLOG AND DON'T COME BACK.

Stop trying to ruin my photography business and my blog. Leave me alone.

Thomas Churchwell Puts Words In Scarlett's Mouth She Never Said

Thomas Churchwell, about your recent Wordpress libel posts, stop putting quotation marks around words I didn't say. I NEVER had those conversations that you're posting on your blog. Not with you, or anyone else.

Regarding your allegations that I "stole pictures off the Internet," you know that is a lie.

You know the words "photo theft" mean disregarding a copyright signature or warning about posting a picture—such as the warning I gave you to stop posting my commercial photography in 2007.

The pictures you asked me to find for you had no signatures, no warnings, and no copyrights. Further, I never posted those pictures on any site. You did.

Readers, Thomas Churchwell is psychotic. He put his psychiatrist's evaluation on his own blog last summer.

He has the credibility of a gnat.


Recapping, Churchwell began his attacks on me the day after I ended those short-lived conversations with him in 2006. Being the vengeful type, he published my commercial still-life photograph of a watch and Christmas ornament on at least four websites, including Photobucket, Flickr, LiveJournal and Blogger. Also, he defaced my Christmas photography and published his defiled version alongside my copyrighted original. When I found out, I asked him to remove both images. He refused. He then filed a bogus claim on Photobucket against my copyright, which is a crime, and libeled me all over the Internet as a thief of my own photography.

Recently he admitted on his site that I was the photographer of that image.

Churchwell, you had a "career" as a pickpocket in a strip bar, according to your own posts, and you stole the copyright of my commercial photography. People think you are a LOON.

And stop stalking my site. Seeing you refresh my page dozens of times a day (at all hours) is very odd and makes me wonder if there isn’t something better that you can occupy your time with. Perhaps getting a job?

Loose Ends

For the most part, I dislike FAQs. They’re generally filled with pointless information such as meticulous lists of the author’s favorite foods, as if anyone cares other than family and friends. However, the difference between the average everyday FAQ and this one is that people actually asked me this stuff. Since today is the last day of 2008, I think it's a good time to tie up loose ends. So, here you go.

1. Why do you write anonymously? I’ll never take anything you say seriously unless you’re willing to put your full name on it.

For all you know, everyone writes anonymously, but you just believe them when they sign their posts ‘Sarah Goodbody.’

For me, the ideas presented are what is important. I couldn't care less what the name is. Besides, with cyber bullies and stalkers prowling the Internet, it's just plain dumb to blog under your real full name.

Artists and authors have been using pen names and pseudonyms for generations now. Baiters like Thomas Tarquin Churchwell should stop acting like this is some odd phenomenon.

Mark Twain. Richard Bachman. Meatloaf. Prince. Madonna. Lemony Snicket. J.K Rowling. Fiona Apple. Nicolas Bourbaki. George Eliot. Irving Berlin. Bono. Cher. Elvis Costello. Mick Jagger. Rudyard Kipling. Spike Lee. Jerry Lewis. George Orwell. Lewis Carroll. Sting.

All these names are either partially accurate or completely fake.

Of course, the fact of the matter is that I have revealed my real first name in this blog's title. Anyone wanting more than that should show me that they can be trusted.

2. What was your motivation for starting this site?

Is there anyone who doesn't know why I started this site? I started it to set the record straight about the malicious lies that Thomas Tarquin Churchwell has been writing about me every day for more than two years.

3. For a long time you didn't allow comments on your site. Why?

Well, I think that’s pretty obvious, don’t you? Every time I allowed comments on my blog, I was bombarded with sick, unprintable anonymous comments written by Thomas Churchwell.

4. Have you become cynical about blogging?

No way!

One of the reasons I felt comfortable meeting other bloggers two years ago, was because I was under the assumption — and this theory required a leap of faith which required that I accept the innate goodness of man — that if an individual could tie words together and make a sentence that communicated a thought, it meant that he had adequate control over his mental faculties, that he was not crazy, or at least not dangerous, or at least medicated enough to be acceptable to society. I was so naive. Now I am wiser, but I still believe that most bloggers are nice people.

5. Do you think Thomas Churchwell will ever give up bullying?

I think that if he ever faces certain truths about himself, he might stop beating up women on the Internet.

Readers, I hope you will have much fun tonight! See you tomorrow.

Thomas Tarquin Churchwell: Stop. Leave Me Alone

I do not know Thomas Tarquin Churchwell from Queens, NY and Portsmouth, New Hampshire, except as a bully on the Internet, and stalker of my blog. He enjoys seeing his name splashed across the Internet. I do not. I do not enjoy being cyber bullied, libeled and stalked. I have asked him to stop many times.

Please leave me alone. Go away. Stop blogging lies about me.

LEAVE ME ALONE.

To Churchwell's Psychiatrist

Yesterday, your patient, Thomas Tarquin Churchwell, stated on his blog that he is a "psycho and a liar". Today he repeated his often published lie that I and another blogger have threatened his family. I am sure you would advise me to ignore him, and I am trying. I just thought you should know that he is still writing malicious libel about women, and is still fixated on child pornography. I understand you are monitoring his Internet listings.

Triviality Threatens

Thomas Churchwell. I just saw that ream of posts you wrote this morning. Your fantastical lie that I am "bullying" your family - who I don't know and couldn't care less about - proves that you really are nuts, if you believe what you wrote.

Your blogs are not only perverse and deeply offensive, they are cruelly egocentric. What comes across to strangers is not that I am any of the terrible things you write about me, but that you are a hateful, narcissistic nutcase.

I and other bloggers are the true victims here. We don't have to prove a thing to the likes of you. Maybe it's time for you prove a few things to us.

Let's see your psychiatric report again.

Let's see your prison record, showing the crime for which you were locked up.

Let's see proof that you blinded the man you called Gumby, because if you did that, you are a crumb, for sure.

Original Post:

Thomas Churchwell has said more than once that he knows when something he does is wrong, but he does it anyway. At other times, when he seems to think that he may be held accountable for his behavior, he will say he's crazy. He recently wrote that "17 psychiatrists" examined him and failed to agree on exactly what is wrong with him.

Cyber bullies like to portray themselves as downtrodden victims. Some of you may remember that Churchwell's first blog was called 'The Haters.' Who were these so-called haters? He had a list of bloggers' names. Most of them were bloggers on Cape Cod Today who had caught him in multiple lies. So, he opened a blog about them, wrote nasty allegations about them, and called them "the haters," yet he never posted a single shred of proof.

In addition to falsely portraying himself as a victim, Churchwell likes to say he is being stalked. There is a grain of hilarity in that one, when you consider stalking victims generally are famous, beautiful, accomplished, or possess some other quality perceived by a stalker as enviable. Take the nutcase who stalked and murdered John Lennon. He idolized Lennon for his talent and fame but saw himself as a zero. He wanted to be famous like Lennon. He was jealous. In his marginal mind, all he could do was kill him. Churchwell is a stalker on the blogosphere. Since he began stalking me two years ago, he has bragged about calling every gallery in my town, and the Chamber of Commerce, in an effort to find out where I live. Last May, he posted a defiled version of a commercial photograph of mine on several websites with the caption: "Do you know the photographer of this crappy photo? Email me." In February of this year, he threatened to show up at my home. Yes, he actually posted the threat on his blog. In the disturbing post where he bragged about blinding the man he called 'Gumby', he threatened me: "I am coming to stop you." Of course, I reported his threat to the Police. "Oh, he lives in that building for nutsos," the detective sighed. Churchwell has written reams of lies about my two phone calls to the custodians of that building, who unfortunately couldn't help me and his other victims, because they had their hands full trying to deal with the disruption he was causing there.

As I stated above, Churchwell likes to rant about imaginary attacks on his family. Even worse are the posts in which he accuses me and other bloggers of being thieves and pornographers. There is no truth to it, so why doesn't he stop? For one thing, he knows nothing could more damaging than having this type of defamation on the Internet. It's the old Gestapo trick of accusing innocent people of sexual perversion, when they cannot be proved guilty of some other crime. We know why the Nazi did this; they hated Jews. Tarquin Churchwell seems to hate the world. He has the mindset of a thug.

Why hasn't Google shut down his blogs? Given the awful truth that Google hosts blogsites penned by terrorists, they couldn't care less about shutting down woman hating bullies. Speaking out is the only thing that might help. Because if no one speaks out, if bloggers continue to look away apathetically like sheep, the day will come when blogland will be run by marauding bullies and other sickos. Many female bloggers already have given up blogging because of these losers.

Is He Sick Or Slick?

Is Thomas Churchwell sick or slick? Is he crazy, or writing vicious posts about me with a wink and a smirk? The answer to this question might be known by his court-appointed psychiatrist. But even if he is nutty as a fruitcake, as he would have us believe in a recent blog post, mental illness does not excuse libel and threats. "I can't help what I do," is a pathetically stupid alibi. If he really cannot control his hateful impulses, he should be locked up and medicated. Otherwise, as long as he remains "free" to smear innocent women on the Internet, it is presumed that he knows what he is doing, and therefore, is accountable for every word he writes.

Let's hope his psychiatrist and guardian will take a look at his blogs.

Thomas Churchwell Is a Liar and a Loon

I don't want to address Churchwell, and I know that long time readers of the blogs share my aversion. I am fine, though. This is not like last year, when his vicious blogs made me so ill that I ended up in a hospital with pleurisy. I am stronger this time.

I'll confirm what you already know. Everything Thomas Churchwell writes on the subject of me (and many other people) is libel. There has never been any truth in anything he says.