Thomas Churchwell, about your recent Wordpress libel posts, stop putting quotation marks around words I never said. I NEVER had those conversations that you're posting. Not with you, or anyone else.
Regarding your screwball allegations, do a Google image search for "nude pictures." Type it in a search bar, and you will get more than 6,000,000 hits. An astonishing number and why do you suppose there are that many? Because people share pictures on the Internet! There are billions of images, from apples to zylophones, on Yahoo and Google that are being posted and reposted on blogs every day.
I find it almost funny that you are playing blog police about public domain pictures, given your checkered past as a confessed pickpocket as well as thief of my commercial photography. The fact is, anyone who has a blog—and there are 70,000,000 blogs—has posted public domain photos, sometimes called stock photos, that can be found in any image search. If this is "stealing" in your mind, then that means there are approximately 70,000,000 thieves running loose on the Internet. Hilarious.
Stealing applies to a copyright signature, or some other warning against posting a picture—such as the warning I gave you to stop posting my commercial photography. The nudies had no signatures, no warnings, no copyrights.
And keep in mind that I didn't post those photos. You did. You copied photos to your computer that you like to say were "stolen" and you have been posting them on your sites for three years. You have the credibility of a gnat.
Readers, in case you don't know the facts about Thomas Churchwell, he was diagnosed as being psychotic. For unknown reasons, perhaps to get attention, he posted his psychiatrist's diagnosis on his own blog last summer. As for the nudie pictures, it is worth mentioning that I wouldn't have had that type of picture in my files, had he not pushed me repeatedly during those few weeks I talked with him in 2006. Since I wasn't about to comply with his demands for nude pictures of myself, I put the public domain pictures in my documents file (after he started pouting), so that he could ogle them instead. Telling you that people can't share pictures in Yahoo Instant Messenger is another of his loony lies, and easily disproved. He needs to discuss with his doctors his ambivalent feelings about women, namely, his lust and all-consuming hate, instead of continuing in the same vein as a highly disruptive presence on the Internet. For all concerned, I hope he will stop his outrageous libel of me and others.
I find it almost funny that you are playing blog police about public domain pictures, given your checkered past as a confessed pickpocket as well as thief of my commercial photography. The fact is, anyone who has a blog—and there are 70,000,000 blogs—has posted public domain photos, sometimes called stock photos, that can be found in any image search. If this is "stealing" in your mind, then that means there are approximately 70,000,000 thieves running loose on the Internet. Hilarious.
Stealing applies to a copyright signature, or some other warning against posting a picture—such as the warning I gave you to stop posting my commercial photography. The nudies had no signatures, no warnings, no copyrights.
And keep in mind that I didn't post those photos. You did. You copied photos to your computer that you like to say were "stolen" and you have been posting them on your sites for three years. You have the credibility of a gnat.
Readers, in case you don't know the facts about Thomas Churchwell, he was diagnosed as being psychotic. For unknown reasons, perhaps to get attention, he posted his psychiatrist's diagnosis on his own blog last summer. As for the nudie pictures, it is worth mentioning that I wouldn't have had that type of picture in my files, had he not pushed me repeatedly during those few weeks I talked with him in 2006. Since I wasn't about to comply with his demands for nude pictures of myself, I put the public domain pictures in my documents file (after he started pouting), so that he could ogle them instead. Telling you that people can't share pictures in Yahoo Instant Messenger is another of his loony lies, and easily disproved. He needs to discuss with his doctors his ambivalent feelings about women, namely, his lust and all-consuming hate, instead of continuing in the same vein as a highly disruptive presence on the Internet. For all concerned, I hope he will stop his outrageous libel of me and others.
Recapping, the last contact I had with Thomas Churchwell, off the blogs, was in 2006 when he pressured me into putting nude pictures on the IM. He really wanted "crotch shots," he told me, and was very disappointed when he didn't get any. He copied much tamer snaps of unknown women to his computer, while I was talking to him on the IM. The women's faces had been cropped by the uncredited persons who snapped the photos.
The day after he uploaded the pictures, I told him what I thought he already knew, that the pictures weren't actually me. He believed they were me (he claimed), as if nice women go around the Web showing pictures of their breasts to strangers! This gets to the core of Churchwell's gripe and it has nothing to do with his allegations that the pictures were stolen. Given his history of stealing, he wouldn't have cared if those pictures had been swiped from Hugh Hefner's safe. No, he is still nursing a grudge over being "tricked," as he sees it. He pressured me for nude pictures and believes to this day that he was entitled to have them!
Churchwell, you began your attacks on me the day after I ended our conversations in 2006. As part of your revenge, you published my commercial still-life photograph of a watch and Christmas ornament on at least four websites. You defaced my Christmas photography with one of your software programs and published the defiled version alongside the copyrighted original. When I found out, you refused to remove the photos from Photobucket, Flickr, LiveJournal and Blogger. You then filed a bogus claim on Photobucket against my copyright, which is a crime, and libeled me all over the Internet as a thief of my own photography! Recently, you admitted on your site that I am the photographer of that image.
Since your former "career" was pickpocket in a strip bar, where you helped yourself to watches and wallets (according to brags in your own blog posts), and since you recently stole my copyright of a commercial photograph, you are the last person in the world who should be calling anyone a thief.
People think you are a LOON. And, if your recent posts with the bogus conversations are another bully scheme, you may as well stop. I am NOT closing my blog.
Got it?
And stop stalking my site. Seeing you refresh my page dozens of times a day (at all hours) is obsessive and makes me wonder if there isn’t something better that you can occupy your time with. Perhaps getting a job?
3 comments:
Thomas ChurchBad is a disgusting freak and now, writing posts that are password protected! Good gravy! LOL.
He's hot air and NO ONE is interested in any of his reconstructed "conversations".
What's important is the fact, that he would keep such things (or even claim to do so) thats what's so very frightening and proves all the points you've so successfully argued about him, being a total psycho. Time for the men in white coats to take him away.
There are NO word for Thomas Tarquin Churchwell's latest rant about CW. That "blog" he writes should be deleted by WordPress. Obviously, he's having a break with reality.
Scarlett, he is a middle age man, isn't he? He should know better than to slime his way around the internet, leaving harassing filth on women's blogs and wrongly accusing you of something you didn't do, simply because he hates his parents.
Post a Comment